Prediction of Kay Winthrop Mckean vs Rosamond Newton Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
K. Winthrop Mckean vs R. Newton

Kay Winthrop Mckean

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

111

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Rosamond Newton

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

111

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Mckean 1 - 0 Newton

They have played 2 sets in total, with Kay Winthrop Mckean winning 2 and Rosamond Newton winning 0. The last match between Kay Winthrop Mckean and Rosamond Newton was at the Manchester-on-Sea, 18-07-1932, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Kay Winthrop Mckean getting the victory 6-1 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mckean	1
Newton	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Manchester-on-Sea(07-18-32)

Stats

Kay Winthrop Mckean

Rosamond Newton

K. W. Mckean vs R. Newton H2H Profile

K. W. Mckean	Stats	R. Newton
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
61.88% (237-146)	Career Total W/L	50.26% (95-94)
1	Grass	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

K. W. Mckean vs R. Newton Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kay Winthrop Mckean has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Rosamond Newton has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kay Winthrop Mckean, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rosamond Newton has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Kay Winthrop Mckean has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rosamond Newton has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Kay Winthrop Mckean has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Rosamond Newton winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Kay Winthrop Mckean has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 6/2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 19/17). Rosamond Newton has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 75% (W/L 53/28), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 30/51).
Player level: In the last year, Kay Winthrop Mckean has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Rosamond Newton has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kay Winthrop Mckean winning 1 times and Rosamond Newton being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kay Winthrop Mckean winning 2 and Rosamond Newton winning 0.
The last match between Kay Winthrop Mckean and Rosamond Newton was at the Manchester-on-Sea, 18-07-1932, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Kay Winthrop Mckean getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kay Winthrop Mckean has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Rosamond Newton has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kay Winthrop Mckean has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rosamond Newton has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Kay Winthrop Mckean has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rosamond Newton has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Kay Winthrop Mckean vs Rosamond Newton Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

K. W. Mckean vs R. Newton H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

K. W. Mckean	Stats	R. Newton
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	3
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

K. W. Mckean Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Manchester-on-Sea - 12-08-1958
R3 Sally MooreS. Moore	L	UNK	Stats
Manchester-on-Sea - 22-08-1955
R3 Darlene HardD. Hard	W	W/O	Stats
R4 Shirley BloomerS. Bloomer	L	W/O	Stats
Manchester-on-Sea - 11-08-1953
R3 Andy Ross DilleyA. Ross	L	6-3 4-6 6-3	Stats
US National Championships - 29-08-1952
R3 Helen FletcherH. Fletcher	L	4-6 6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

R. Newton Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Longwood Bowl - 06-08-1934
R3 Gracyn Wheeler KelleherG. Wheeler	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Manchester-on-Sea - 16-07-1934
R2 Norma TaubeleN. Taubele	L	6-1 2-6 6-2	Stats
Manchester-on-Sea - 17-07-1933
R2 Mrs Seth CrawfordM. Seth	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
Brookline Invitational - 10-07-1933
R3 Josephine CruickshankJ. Cruickshank	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Manchester-on-Sea - 18-07-1932
R3 Kay Winthrop MckeanK. Winthrop	L	6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

K. W. Mckean vs R. Newton Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

K. W. Mckean	Stats	R. Newton
61.88% (237/146)	YTD Win/Loss	50.26% (95/94)
58.74% (477/335)	Sets Win/Loss	51.61% (192/180)
100.00% (4048/0)	Games Win/Loss	50.87% (1601/1546)
75.00% (6/2)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
52.78% (19/17)	Clay Win/Loss	42.86% (3/4)
81.48% (44/10)	Indoor Hard W/L	45.00% (9/11)
58.13% (143/103)	Grass Win/Loss	37.04% (30/51)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
51.22% (21/20)	Slam W/L	11.11% (1/8)
61% (216/353)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	51% (88/173)
60% (58/96)	Deciding Set Win %	38% (10/26)
92% (215/197)	1st Set Won, Won Match	91% (92/84)
8% (215/17)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	9% (92/8)
16% (147/24)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	5% (81/4)